Brad sent me a link to a recent article by Michigan sociologist Jeremy Levine: It’s Time to Move On From Community Consensus
How do debate in the public square when the public square is roped off? How do you maximize attendance at open houses when your public health officer limits the size of public gatherings? One approach is to simply suspend public participation in important decisions for the duration of the pandemic. But this is not a workable approach as COVID drags on. No community can afford to make decisions in a vacuum for a year or more. Moreover, the pandemic itself is creating an urgent need for decision making in the face of high stakes, uncertainty, and significant polarization. A critical stage in our process is “structuring” preferences. What does this mean and why is it critical? We like to express preferences in the form of fundamental objectives. These are aspirational statements that emerge from an initial, problem-specific, consultation with your community.1 A fundamental objective typically consists of a directional verb plus an outcome. I have written elsewhere about the distinction between fundamental objectives and means objectives (see the classic work by Keeney). What is the difference? To use an example from our success stories on this site: Means objective: Build an ultra-violet water treatment plant What follows is my to-do list for decision makers in local government faced with a thorny problem: The objective of many public consultation processes is to achieve consensus within a community behind a particular policy or initiative. As discussed below, achieving true consensus around anything other than the most trivial motherhood statement is difficult, if not impossible. And failure to acknowledge this difficulty is one reason that so many public consultations so quickly degenerate into a sales job, in which a local government desperately tries to convince its constituents that their favored course of action is best. Some believe that, if we can just get citizens together in a room, we can engage in dialog and work rationally towards a consensus. But our view—which is plastered all over our website—is that consensus is not a realistic goal for local government decisions. Before I talk about why consensus does not (and should not) exist, let me backtrack a bit and recount one of my first experiences with consensus:
Tradeoffs and the Project Management Triangle
By Michael Brydon on Tue, 08-Sep-2020
The First Rule of participative decision making
By Michael Brydon on Fri, 28-Aug-2020
Fundamental (end) objective: Provide safe water for the lowest possible cost
A to-do list for local government decision makers
By Michael Brydon on Thu, 27-Aug-2020
Why seeking consensus is the wrong goal
By Michael Brydon on Fri, 21-Aug-2020
False consensus and the Subaru Crowd
By Michael Brydon on Wed, 19-Aug-2020
Copyright © 2022. All rights reserved.